Sovereign Command Scorecard
A 5‑minute diagnostic revealing your Board’s AI oversight maturity across four sovereign governance pillars. Your results include a Sovereignty Verdict, your Achilles Heel, and board questions to raise at your next meeting.
A downloadable Board Brief provides a printable artifact with your verdict, Achilles Heel, a and proposed Board–CIO/CTO commitments.
To help Boards advance even more quickly, your results also include personalized recommendations.
Our scorecard: the fastest way for Boards to understand their AI risks and what to do next.
AI generated
The Four Modules
Your Scorecard is structured around the four pillars of sovereign AI governance:
Fiduciary Command & Oversight: How clearly the Board holds command over AI decisions, including governance structures, escalation paths, kill‑switch authority, and independent risk functions.
Data Sovereignty & IP Protection: Whether the organization maintains control over its data and intelligence assets: contractual rights, deletion guarantees, jurisdiction exposure, shadow AI risks, and protection of proprietary IP.
Operational Autonomy & Resilience: The Board’s ability to ensure operational continuity and independence: model portability, exit triggers, break‑glass options, human‑in‑the‑loop authority, whistleblowing routes, and sovereign backup capacity.
Adversarial Defense & Compliance: How defendable the organization is under scrutiny: audit trails, red‑team readiness, responsibility for bias, model registry practices, and ongoing drift monitoring.
“Directors don’t need to be technologists, but they do need to understand how AI will shape the future – of the economy, their industry, and their organisations.”
Source: Australian Institute of Company Directors, AI use by directors and boards, December 2025